![]() ![]() ![]() For more complex/less standardized models or smaller deals, coverage is more likely to take the pen on M&A processes. As far as modeling, you'll get a lot of experience running/building operating models from IPOs and high yield processes (to a slightly lesser extent). If you're actually interested in learning the job, you will get a more well rounded experience in coverage assuming you're on a team with a meaningful amount of dealflow. That being said, if you put in two good years and then move to a client, it's a win for everyone. If you're not actually interested in learning the job you signed up for and are payed 6 figures to do, people will go out of their way to give you the shitty work and make your life more difficult. ![]() To be blunt, the group pays you well to support their seniors and to learn the job of a coverage banker. It's true that if you only look at it from the lens of what will help you get you the best PE offer with the least amount of work on your end, M&A is a better option than coverage. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |